#706 closed enhancement (fixed)
async_usleep vs fibril_usleep vs thread_usleep
Reported by: | Jiri Svoboda | Owned by: | Jiri Svoboda |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 0.7.2 |
Component: | helenos/unspecified | Version: | mainline |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocker for: | Depends on: | ||
See also: |
Description
async_usleep() and fibril_usleep() seem to be doing the same thing (differently). Some code uses one and other code uses the other. We should unify both. Some code even uses thread_usleep() which is wrong.
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | 0.7.1 |
---|
comment:2 by , 7 years ago
Owner: | set to |
---|---|
Status: | new → accepted |
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | accepted → closed |
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
Milestone: | → 0.7.2 |
---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Replaced calls to fibril_(u)sleep with async_(u)sleep (commit). Replaced many uses of thread_usleep with async_usleep (commit, commit).